Monday, December 7, 2009

Are you a Ponzi scheme victim - Madoff, Rothstein, Stanford, Petter or other?

A free 50-minute web seminar is being hosted by veteran South Florida tax attorney Richard S. Lehman.

Sign up here and you will be emailed a link to the web seminar - it will be available for on demand viewing strarting Dec 15.

This web seminar is for victims and financial professionals. Learn how recovery through the "Tax Refund" is quick and reliable.

Richard S. Lehman will explain:

  • How to best secure a tax refund from Ponzi Scheme losses
  • How the government has made recovery easier
  • What you need to know about theft losses
Resources for the web seminar:
  1. Seminar Outline

  2. Revenue Ruling (relates to The Law) - download pdf

  3. Revenue Procedure (relates to Safe Harbor) - download pdf

Monday, November 9, 2009

Foreign Bank Deposits and Financial Assets

The Jaws are Closing on the U.S. Taxpayer
by Richard S. Lehman, P.A.

On March 23, 2009 the I.R.S. initiated an Amnesty Program for the purpose of permitting taxpayers with foreign bank deposits to fully disclose these foreign deposits and avoid criminal sanctions as long as the taxpayer was not under investigation by I.R.S. at the time of the disclosure and the income involved was earned form legal sources. (The “Amnesty Program”).

The Amnesty Program also assured taxpayers in the program of a fixed calculable amount of all the costs involved that included, taxes, penalties and interest, necessary to pay off in full any civil liabilities owed by the taxpayers.

The Amnesty Program caused at least 7,500 taxpayers to come forward for the benefits of the program. The program was terminated on October 15, 2009.

Other than assuring taxpayers of a fixed amount of money that would be due to the I.R.S. and adding certain procedural protections of a taxpayer, the Amnesty Program did not differ from and was based upon the long standing Voluntary Disclosure Program. Under this Program, the I.R.S. has accepted late filed and amended returns without applying any criminal penalties for decades so long as the requirements of the Voluntary Disclosure Program were met.

Many taxpayers now regret the fact that they did not accept the I.R.S. Amnesty Program. This is because the Voluntary Disclosure Program, like the Amnesty Program, will still permit taxpayers to avoid criminal prosecution with a Voluntary Disclosure of all previous taxes due. However, the Voluntary Compliance Program does not provide the taxpayer with any guarantees of the amount that may be assessed against a taxpayer for the complete payment of all taxes, interest and in particular, penalties that are due. Under the worst of circumstances, these potential penalties can easily exhaust the long term build-up of a foreign bank deposit upon which taxes were not paid.

This article is not about the Voluntary Disclosure Program, though future articles will be published on this Website that will describe the Voluntary Disclosure Program. This article is about the actions that are being taken now by the U.S. to force the full disclosure of all foreign assets and income of U.S. taxpayers. This article is intended to encourage high net worth individuals with unreported foreign income and assets to take advantage of the I.R.S. Voluntary Disclosure Program as soon as possible so that they avoid criminal actions and to limit their civil penalties before it is too late. The U.S. is moving fast on high net wealth tax payers, especially with overseas assets.

High net worth taxpayers with foreign income and foreign assets must be aware that two actions were recently taken on the exact same date aimed at U.S. taxpayers with foreign assets. One step was taken by the Internal Revenue Service and the other by the House of Representatives in a proposed new bill presently known as HR.3933.

The Internal Revenue Service announced that a new division was recently established to specifically audit and deal with wealthy Americans who are hiding assets. This was announced by I.R.S. Dave Schulman and reported on October 27th. According to Commissioner Schulman, the I.R.S. is going to take a “unified look” at the entire web of business entities controlled by a high wealth individual”.

Almost simultaneous with this announcement by the I.R.S. of this specialized audit group, on October 27th the House of Representatives announced the introduction of the “Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act”. This new law would force foreign financial institutions, foreign trusts, foreign corporations and tax advisers involved with such entities to provide information about US. account holders, owners, guarantors and clients with those entities.

The bill in essence will require foreign financial institutions, trusts, foreign corporations and other entities that earn income from U.S. financial assets to withhold a 30% tax on that income and pay it to the U.S. unless that foreign institution agrees to disclose the identity of any U.S. persons, both directly and indirectly, with accounts in those institutions.

High net worth individuals with foreign assets will soon find that they are squeezed between these two new actions and forced to fully disclose all of their income from whatever sources or suffer serious penalties with serious jail time and financial burdens.

The following is a short summary of this new proposed bill.
  • The bill would impose a thirty percent (30%) withholding tax on income from U.S. financial assets held by a foreign financial institution unless the foreign financial institution agrees to disclose the identity of any U.S. individual with an account at the institution (or the institution’s affiliates) and to annual report on the account balance, gross receipts and gross withdrawals/payment from such account. Foreign financial institutions would also be required to agree to disclose and report on foreign entities that have substantial U.S. owners.

  • The bill would require foreign corporations to provide withholding agents with the name, address and tax identification number of any U.S. individual that is a substantial owner of the foreign corporation (i.e., owns more than ten percent (10%) of the foreign corporation’s stock (by vote or value)).

  • The bill would require any individual that holds more than $50,000 (in the aggregate) in (1) a depository or custodial account maintained by a foreign financial institution or (2) any foreign stock, interest in a foreign entity, or financial instrument with a foreign counterparty not held in a custodial account of a financial institution (collectively, “reportable foreign assets”) to report information about these accounts and/or assets to the U.S. Treasury Department with the individual’s annual tax return. Failures to comply with this requirement would be subject to a penalty of $10,000, and higher penalties (up to $50,000) could apply if the failure is not remedies within 90 days following notification from the Treasury Department.

  • Penalties for underpayments attributable to undisclosed foreign financial assets. The bill would impose a penalty equal to forty percent (40%) of the amount of any understatement that is attributable to an undisclosed foreign financial asset (i.e., any foreign financial asset that a taxpayer is required to disclose and fails to disclose on an information return).

  • Advisors who help set up offshore accounts would be required to disclose their activities or pay a penalty.

The bill strengthens rules and penalties with regard to foreign trusts, including rules to determine whether distributions from foreign trusts are going to U.S. beneficiaries and reporting requirements on U.S. transfers to foreign trusts.

If you are like many others who are still confused, it is now time you contact a tax attorney.

Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Organizing a class of people for the purpose of approaching I.R.S.

I am a Florida tax lawyer, specializing in the amnesty and voluntary compliance areas of tax law, and I am organizing a class of people for the purpose of approaching I.R.S. to force it to apply the “Doctrine of Tax Payer Equality” and extend equal treatment to all taxpayers so that taxpayer(s) can continue to take advantage of long standing policies by the I.R.S. that allow them to clear their records without facing confiscatory civil penalties or criminal violations.

I believe that a well-represented large group of taxpayers is the taxpayers’ best chance of fairness and equal treatment.

If you have an unreported foreign bank account and missed the Amnesty Program -- OR -- If you are you afraid to enter into the I.R.S Voluntary Compliance Program - you should contact my office.

Are you going to wait until more information is supplied to the I.R.S. from foreign banks and face criminal tax charges when you can still avoid them right now?

Sincerely,

Richard S. Lehman, Esq.
2600 N. Military Trail, Suite 270
Boca Raton, FL 33431
561-368-1113 Telephone
561-998-9557 Fascimile

Thursday, October 8, 2009

Amnesty – Mostly the Innocent? What do you do about it?

Prior to the announcement of the Amnesty program, the Internal Revenue Service always had a Voluntary Compliance program that would permit taxpayers who had not filed their returns properly, or not filed tax returns at all, to come forward on their own. By voluntarily filing the appropriate tax returns or amended tax returns to make the sure taxpayer was current with the Internal Revenue Service, the criminal tax exposure was waived so long as no investigation of the taxpayer was in process.

This program, which was relied on for years, would normally require the taxpayer to pay the taxes due on the late or amended returns, the interest due on those taxes and a late payment penalty or accuracy penalty of 25%. Other than that, on only rare occasions would a case require the payment of any more penalties, unless of course there was obvious fraud, which could result in higher penalties.

Recently, the Internal Revenue Service published statistics that reflected approximately 3,500 people have taken advantage of the Amnesty Program. This seems rather small in light of the fact that there are published figures that indicate there are approximately 100,000 individuals with offshore bank accounts, approximately 50,000 of which are involved with U.B.S.

From a law practice standpoint, it seems that a lot of the very “innocent” and “near innocent” are stepping forward to take advantage of the Amnesty Program. These are individuals that otherwise would ordinarily qualify for the regular Internal Revenue Service Program.

However, because of the Amnesty Program, the Internal Revenue Service is going to look closer at voluntarily compliance filings “outside” of the Amnesty Program. Therefore, for the first time, taxpayers must face a choice of whether to accept the Amnesty Program with its guaranty of no criminal exposure and its penalty tax of 20% on the bank deposits, or to file under the ordinary Voluntary Compliance Program and avoid criminal exposure, and face potential civil penalties that could be higher than the 20% payment on bank deposits.

In many cases these are taxpayers that have not been hiding bank deposits of unreported income from business or illegal activities. Rather they have been hiding bank deposits from inheritances and other previously taxed income. By choosing amnesty, now everything becomes subject to the 20% bank deposit tax. In accounts where there have been big losses, the removing offshore balances might be less than the 20% tax.

LEARN MORE about this topic from Richard S. Lehman, P.A.
Attorney-client privilege is one of the strongest privileges available under law.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

IRS says approximately 3,500 people have taken advantage of the Amnesty Program

Recently, the Internal Revenue Service published statistics that reflected approximately 3,500 people have taken advantage of the Amnesty Program. This seems rather small in light of the fact that there are published figures that indicate there are approximately 100,000 individuals with offshore bank accounts, approximately 50,000 of which are involved with U.B.S.

Monday, October 5, 2009

The IRS extends amnesty deadline for offshore bank accounts to Oct 15, 2009

This IRS Amnesty Program originally terminated on September 23, 2009. IRS recently extended that deadline to Oct 15, 2009.

Now that you may still have time to meet the deadline -- here is a recent article that may help many Americans better understand this IRS Program:

Americans With Foreign Bank Deposits And Unreported Income – A Stay Out Of Jail Card From The I.R.S.
by Richard S. Lehman, P.A.

The most recent headlines include a controversy between the United Bank of Switzerland and the Swiss government versus the Internal Revenue Service of the United States. The U.S. is seeking the names of approximately 50,000 Americans with offshore bank accounts at U.B.S.

The headlines are a result of very strong efforts by the United States in recent years to stop the use of “tax havens” where Americans were depositing unreported income that had not been taxed and were doing so with anonymity and impurity.

Those efforts have started to bear fruit for the U.S. tax collectors. Since knowingly not reporting income on your Federal income tax return is a crime, many U.S. individuals were put in a hard place with important choices to make about taxes.

The Internal Revenue Service has very intelligently made that choice easier.

Read full article: http://www.lehmantaxlaw.com/amnesty_IRS.html

This author has found on many occasions that it is extremely helpful to request that counsel meet directly with the I.R.S. criminal investigator, without discussing the taxpayer’s name, for advice on dealing with gray areas of the law.